Is it the crime that’s so bad – or does a certain sort of victim make it unacceptable? (Vis a vis phone-hacking of course)

It’s strange that it’s taken a particular sort of phone hacking target to cause the condemnation and outrage that has engulfed News International – of the especially vulnerable victims of high profile crimes. The actual crime – hacking – is the same whether it’s of a wayward tv soap star or a 911 victim. But it’s taken allegations of the hacking of 911 victims and their families, to get US legislators calling for investigations.

In Britain, not even the hacking of the Royal Family with all the serious implications for security that entails, led to the furore we’re seeing now.

Maybe this is the backlash MPs have been predicting privately since being outed by the media over their expenses? Is this just a massive swinging-back of the pendulum, as the media-dominated British public who’d previously lapped up tabloid phone-hacked stories, suddenly take against journalists – and obviously their crony politicians? Who will be next? We’ve already had bankers… estate agents? Once the rotten apples have been thrown away, will anything have changed?

Share

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Doug Karr says:

    Good afternoon,

    I am contacting you regarding your website, hughmcmanners.com.

    My name is Doug, and I am a Navy Veteran and Outreach Coordinator for an Internet resource that provides health information to the veteran community. I would like to inquire about sharing a veteran health article on your website.

    Please email me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your time.

    Yours in health,

    Doug

    Douglas Karr, USN Veteran
    Operations Desert Storm & Desert Shield

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *